| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Marcus Walkuris
Aww yeahhh
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.05 23:16:00 -
[1] - Quote
Doing lvl4 missions with 5 characters no matter what they fly is insane unless that is what you somehow get a kick out of. You could use 5 miners to mine in 0.9 systems and make better income... It is already inefficient to have 2 combat vessels in the same mission. If you really insist on 5 characters though I would say 2x 2 dominix with some remote rep and 1 salvager character. Nothing can stand that amount of AFK dps, you wont even need to fit them with MJD. |

Marcus Walkuris
Aww yeahhh
23
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 10:32:00 -
[2] - Quote
I will whole-heartedly advise you to rattlesnake out of those. Lots of tank spare highs or FoF missiles, you want to train for using the setup, then you might as well make it a low stress one. Of-course you should get that program to run multiple accounts too, don't know its name though. Just google multi-box EvE program.
|

Marcus Walkuris
Aww yeahhh
24
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 21:26:00 -
[3] - Quote
The rattlesnake is essentially the drake of the BS class, despite it being drone based. It has the tanking bonus and the largest shield recharge and capacity. Allowing for the passive and active setup. But with multiple ships you may be able to use some kind of freak remote rep+shield extender setup. Focussing on active tanking but buffered as well sacrificing some dps, this was always the attraction to drakes the flexibility. Sadly drakes only flexibility now is bending over backwards to do no dps. |

Marcus Walkuris
Aww yeahhh
24
|
Posted - 2013.11.06 22:58:00 -
[4] - Quote
Well yes, five drakes after all.. |

Marcus Walkuris
Aww yeahhh
27
|
Posted - 2013.11.11 10:25:00 -
[5] - Quote
IF that is your style you should go with railgun boats. Railguns are flexible enough with kinetic thermal, have a faster rate of fire then artillery and apply instantly. You should get very nice "pops" with that setup. I don't think you can get better applied dps then that except for for with sentry ships. But that seems to not be your intent. |
| |
|